If an Electron Can Be in Two Places at Once, Why Can't You?


It was bit of a shock because that was the LAST thing I thought she'd do since she was telling me she only had energy for herself.. Everything Worth Knowing About Tell me what I should do. Page 1 of 2. Places to get married [ 5 Answers ] Hello, Im thinking of getting married abroad next year live in the uk anywhere in the world is an option and I wanted to hear of any experiences or top rated places and services that is out there. Common sense says there should be no interference pattern in this case: I will try to keep this simple.

Check out some similar questions!

Its so hard though Positive manifestation is the key - right? Deep down she probably knows you're pining for her and waiting in the wings for her to snap her fingers and come running when she's ready. Which is just not very manly. If she had strong feelings for you nothing would stop her jumping at the chance to be with you. Maybe you're too obvious in your need to be with her.

I would strongly suggest seeing other people right now. You might only have her on your mind but if she's not ready you have to respect that and live your own life free of hope that one day this girl will turn round and say "be with me".

She might don't get me wrong. But I think you have to change what you're doing right now because its not working. We'd like to understand what you find wrong with dealmein's answer: Disappear from her life, and enjoy your own. Talaniman Rule- Never, ever, get involved with someone who hasn't gotten over the ex. May 6, , So a continuation of this saga. I recognize that my part in this situation was that I invested much more than she was able to reciprocate with. I still displayed understanding, support and a lot of patience.

I believed in her words as she kept telling me that she had baggage she needed to work through and needed to concentrate on herself and had no energy for anything other than work and to focus on her. Weeks go by with no contact and then I find out she has a new boyfriend. This did not make any sense to me. Can someone explain that one to me? Especially when she kept telling me I was the most amazing person she's ever met and that she'd be a fool to not take the opportunity to be with me but she can't right now?

And then whammo - she thinks getting into a new relationship will solve her problems? If she's so emotionally and physically unavailable, why a new boyfriend? That makes NO sense to me. I've never been in this situation before. Thanks in advance all. I think that it's really clear - it was not meant to be. You invested lots of thought and hope but approached it cautiously.

Which, in hindsight was wise. She wasn't truthful in saying she wanted to wait, and has jumped into another relationship. Wait and see how long it lasts. She was saying to you that she wasn't emotionally available, but also subtext that she wasn't interested. A good lesson for the future when someone says something similar. You've made good your escape! Find someone that is emotionally available. We'd like to understand what you find wrong with Gemini54's answer: She fed you a bunch of BS.

She was leading you on while still keeping you in place with her lies. That's how you explain all this. Leave her alone and move on to someone who's ready and honest. We'd like to understand what you find wrong with ajGambino's answer: Sorry guy but you made the mistake we all do sometimes May 7, , So, I guess what I'm mostly disappointed with is that she didn't tell me about seeing someone else. Is it too much to expect communication from someone who you were dating?

It was bit of a shock because that was the LAST thing I thought she'd do since she was telling me she only had energy for herself.. Originally Posted by sosoconfused. We'd like to understand what you find wrong with IWHO's answer: Originally Posted by Gemini Clearly she wasn't as 'honest and mature' as you first thought. That's why a strong instant, connection can be deceiving.

It always takes time to get to know another person. It's not a matter of 'wrong' or 'right' in terms of your expectations of her. Just understand that people frequently don't behave the way we want them to! Ask your question View similar questions. Search this Question Advanced Search. Places to get married [ 5 Answers ] Hello, Im thinking of getting married abroad next year live in the uk anywhere in the world is an option and I wanted to hear of any experiences or top rated places and services that is out there.

Kilometers between places [ 2 Answers ] Hi can anyone tell me how far it is from miami beach to broardbeach and sufers paradise in queensland? Tell me what I should do I always get myself in this places [ 3 Answers ] Yea yea I know another fight.. Answer Find questions to answer. Send a private message to sosoconfused. Find latest posts by sosoconfused. Helpful Reply We'd like to understand what you find wrong with unouwanit's answer: Find latest posts by unouwanit Send a private message to talaniman.

Find latest posts by talaniman. Helpful Reply We'd like to understand what you find wrong with sosoconfused's answer: Send a private message to UnluckyDucky. Find latest posts by UnluckyDucky. Helpful Reply We'd like to understand what you find wrong with dealmein's answer: Send a private message to dealmein. Find latest posts by dealmein. Helpful Reply We'd like to understand what you find wrong with talaniman's answer: Send a private message to Gemini Find latest posts by Gemini Helpful Reply We'd like to understand what you find wrong with ajGambino's answer: Send a private message to ajGambino.

Find latest posts by ajGambino. You were not paying attention to what she said You weren't on the same page I think false hope kept you going after she was quite clear, but you missed it. What leads to this world? He has an answer, which, if correct, will lead to the first quantum theory that makes as much sense for people as for particles. Penrose believes he has identified the secret that keeps the quantum genie tightly bottled up in the atomic world, a secret that was right in front of us all along: In his novel view, the same force that keeps us pinned to the ground also keeps us locked in a reality in which everything is tidy, unitary, and—for better and for worse—rooted in one place only.

Aside from a frustrating inability to manifest in any number of places simultaneously, Penrose qualifies as something of a quantum phenomenon himself. There do indeed seem to be many Penroses; they just all happen to occupy the same body. There is Penrose the puzzle master, creator of geometric illusions that M. Escher incorporated into some of his most famous works. There is Penrose the neuroscientist, who developed a controversial theory linking consciousness to quantum processes in the brain.

And there is Penrose the author, most recently of a 1,page tome called The Road to Reality , which is modestly subtitled A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe. On our second meeting, all of those Penroses are slumped on a sofa in the living room of his spacious home a few miles outside Oxford. A coffee cup and a plate of cookies rest on his chest, which, since he is sunk so deeply into the sofa, is almost perfectly horizontal.

Tall windows look out on a lush green yard, damp from the rain. In this pensive setting, he looks back on the events that convinced him that quantum theory has serious problems, a view that would be heresy for a young physicist entering academia today.

The crucial moment came during a lecture by Paul Dirac, one of the legendary early thinkers in quantum mechanics.

To illustrate, he broke a piece of chalk in two and then tried to explain why you never saw superpositions in real life. My mind may have wandered briefly, because I never heard his explanation! The maddening part of that problem is that the ability of particles to exist in two places at once is not a mere theoretical abstraction. It is a very real aspect of how the subatomic world works, and it has been experimentally confirmed many times over.

One of the clearest demonstrations comes from a classic physics setup called the double-slit experiment. Penrose graduated with first-class honors from University College London in Ph. Tensor Methods in Algebraic Geometry at St. Number of published papers: Astronomer Dennis Sciama, a leading s advocate of the steady-state theory, which held that the universe is eternal Alternative career: While at University College London, Penrose was forced to choose between biology and mathematics.

Other Penrose Questions 1 How do black holes work? Penrose and physicist Stephen Hawking developed a detailed mathematical description of the gravitational collapse that produces black holes. Penrose developed the idea of cosmic censorship, which holds that information about processes happening within black holes remains forever hidden from outside observers. In this test, a beam of light is projected through two parallel slits cut in an opaque barrier and then onto a white screen.

When light hits the screen, it does not produce just two overlapping regions of brightness. Instead, something strange appears: The 19th-century explanation for this was that light is a wave and that light waves overlap after passing through the slits. The light waves seem to behave much like water waves on the surface of a pond: Where two crests meet, the wave gets higher, creating a bright stripe; where a crest meets a trough, the two cancel out, and the wave vanishes, yielding a dark zone.

With the development of quantum theory in the early 20th century, the explanation became far weirder. Physicists realized that light is not a wave exactly but rather a wavelike particle called a photon. That discovery suggested a new experiment. In principle, it would be possible to send light through the slits one photon at a time and collect them on photographic film. Common sense says there should be no interference pattern in this case: There is only one photon in the apparatus at any given moment, so there is nothing for the light to interfere with.

Then in a young British physicist named Geoffrey Ingram Taylor actually ran the experiment and witnessed the bizarre result. As the photons accumulate on the film, the same old interference pattern of alternating brightand dark stripes gradually appears, defying common sense. In this case, there is only one thing each photon can interact with—itself.

The only way this pattern could form is if each photon passes through both slits at once and then interferes with its alternate self. It is as if a moviegoer exited a theater and found that his location on the sidewalk was determined by another version of himself that had left through a different exit and shoved him on the way out.

Since then, other researchers have repeated the experiment with electrons, atoms, even with relatively bulky molecules containing as many as 70 carbon atoms. The results never vary.

Individual atoms and molecules go through both slits at once. Yet for some reason the laws of physics take away that ability for large objects like paper clips, people, and planets. But rather few people seem to agree with this viewpoint.

When pressed, quantum theorists usually fall back on what is known as the Copenhagen interpretation. In their view, we do not see quantum effects in the every day world because the act of observation changes everything, fixing the many possibilities allowed by quantum mechanics as one.

As a result, when we look, we only see one version of events, with every object firmly anchored to one position at a time. The flaw in the Copenhagen interpretation is that it has no basis in theory—it is more like a story that scientists tell to make sense of facts that otherwise would seem nonsensical. It also suggests that the universe does not become fully real until someone observes it.

Einstein found this idea abhorrent. Nevertheless, the Copenhagen interpretation was voted the preferred explanation of quantum weirdness by physicists at a conference in The runner-up explanation is an even stranger view of reality. Its adherents take the laws of quantum theory at face value: Every possible quantum outcome really exists—but in worlds parallel to our own. In one universe, Penrose is talking with me in Oxford; in another, he is watching a monster-truck rally.

From this perspective, people and particles behave much the same way. We just do not see them in many places at the same time because each potential location is tucked away in a different universe. Penrose cannot believe anyone finds either the Copenhagen interpretation or the many worlds picture satisfactory.

People are led into views of the world which are pretty fantastical. Other Penrose Questions 2 What is gravity? For nearly 40 years, Penrose has worked on twistor theory, a radically original description of gravity, space, and time. Rather than treating space-time as an empty arena in which physical events unfold, Penrose postulates that objects called twistors build the fabric of space-time from the ground up. Other Penrose Questions 3 Can a pattern have no pattern?

Using only a notebook and a pencil, Penrose devised a way to seamlessly cover a flat service in a nonrepeating pattern with just two different shapes, now called Penrose tiles.

This feat had been considered impossible. Researchers have since learned that certain chemicals naturally organize themselves into these patterns, some of which are now used to make nonstick coating for pots and pans. There are four fundamental forces in the universe: Gravity is the only one of the forces that physicists have been unable to explain in quantum terms. Albert Einstein spent more than 30 years in fruitless attempts to harmonize his theories of gravity with quantum mechanics, and his successors are still stumped.

To Penrose, the failures are a clue that physicists are on the wrong path. Most believe that quantum theory is fundamentally sound but that our understanding of gravity must change.

An object the size of a speck of dust would provide the perfect test. At this scale, an object is small enough to be strongly affected by the rules of quantum mechanics but large enough to observe directly. Current theory predicts that such an object could exist in more than one location and could remain in that split state almost indefinitely. If there were a way to observe the speck without disturbing it, we would see quantum strangeness laid bare: Penrose is convinced that conventional quantum theory seems absurd because it is incomplete.

Specifically, it ignores the effects of gravity.